Source: Ars Technica
A Microsoft executive's invocation of "theft" rhetoric signals how AI copyright disputes are shifting from technical and legal arguments toward moral framings that resonate with workers worried about displacement. Microsoft itself has aggressively scraped data to train its own models, which undercuts the company's credibility. But the framing is now in circulation, giving plaintiffs and critics a resonant language that courts and regulators may adopt. AI companies can no longer control the narrative solely through IP law; the debate is becoming cultural and political.