Renters Turn to Deposit Alternatives, Risking Long-Term Costs

Services like deposit alternatives and third-party guarantors target renters priced out of traditional upfront payments, but they replace a one-time cost with recurring fees and weaker tenant protections. Renters who can least afford it end up paying more over time. This creates a two-tier market where landlords collect fees regardless—deposit or guarantee—while financially squeezed renters lose leverage on damage disputes and security refunds that traditional deposits nominally protect.