Source: Lucid
Rather than treating disinformation as a simple information problem solvable through fact-checking, contemporary research shows susceptibility to propaganda operates through emotional coherence, social identity, and narrative satisfaction. People often want to believe falsehoods because they resolve cognitive dissonance or strengthen group belonging. This reframes the intervention challenge from debunking content to understanding why particular framings feel true to specific audiences, which has direct implications for platform policy (flagging alone fails) and political strategy (targeted messaging works precisely because it speaks to pre-existing worldviews). Vaccine hesitancy, election denialism, and conspiratorial thinking aren't discrete information gaps but symptoms of deeper alienation or epistemic fragmentation that require different tools than transparency or media literacy alone.