Source: Gettheleverage
The piece argues that dismissing AI-generated content as worthless "slop" misses why it proliferates: it's economically rational for creators chasing attention and sponsorships on attention platforms, even if it degrades the overall reading experience. The problem isn't that AI content exists—it's that LinkedIn's algorithmic incentives, newsletter monetization models, and founder-worship culture reward volume and confessional oversharing regardless of authenticity, making AI generation a logical tool rather than a quality failure. As long as the economic structure rewards posting velocity over curation, expecting creators to opt out of AI assistance is naive. Platforms would need to change what gets distributed and paid for.