Source: HEATED
Conservative media is selectively citing recent climate research—particularly IPCC revisions on worst-case scenarios—to argue that climate change is no longer a serious threat. The rhetorical move conflates "not as catastrophic as the most extreme models" with "not a problem." It borrows the language of scientific rigor and humility to delegitimize decades of peer-reviewed consensus, treating incremental methodological updates as permission for inaction. The strategy exploits a real communication gap: as climate science becomes more precise and modeled, it becomes easier to cherry-pick data points that sound reassuring to non-expert audiences.