// policy

All signals tagged with this topic

Italy Sets First Regulatory Standard for AI Hallucination Disclosure

Italy's antitrust authority has extracted binding commitments from DeepSeek, Mistral, and Nova to disclose hallucinations with specificity—the first enforceable standard for what "adequate" disclosure means, rather than industry self-regulation or guidelines. AI companies operating in Europe now face concrete disclosure requirements or enforcement action. The precedent matters because other EU regulators are likely to adopt it, giving Italy de facto standard-setting power across the bloc before the EU's AI Act takes full effect.

Google's Pentagon AI deal bypasses internal ethics review

Google formalized what its own researchers didn't know was coming: a Pentagon contract allowing classified military use of its AI models under deliberately vague terms ("any lawful governmental purpose"). OpenAI and xAI made similar moves earlier. Google's deal signals that even companies with formal AI ethics boards can override them when government contracts are sufficiently lucrative and framed as inevitable competitive necessity. AI safety reviews, researcher input, and public consultation are now decoupled from commercial and defense partnerships. Those processes have become performative rather than gating.

OpenAI Pitches Tax Hikes and Public AI Funds to Fund Superintelligence

OpenAI is attempting to preempt regulatory capture by proposing its own fiscal framework—higher capital gains taxes, a sovereign wealth-style AI fund, and expanded social safety nets—before governments impose far stricter constraints on the industry. It's a classic defensive maneuver: by offering a palatable middle path that acknowledges concentration of AI wealth while preserving private incentives, OpenAI hopes to shape the political settlement around AGI rather than cede the conversation to antitrust hawks or socialist regulators. The move signals real anxiety that unfettered AI deployment could trigger a backlash severe enough to shift corporate tax policy and corporate governance, making the proposal as much a bet on technocratic credibility as on the merits of the proposals themselves.