ArXiv caps submissions as AI-generated papers overwhelm the archive

ArXiv's two-paper-per-month limit responds to submission volume nearly doubling in two years. Machine-generated research is flooding the preprint system faster than human peer review can evaluate it. The archive, which functioned as the de facto first-pass filter for physics and computer science, is now a scarcity manager, forcing researchers to choose between their work and computational labs uploading bulk outputs. If major journals impose similar caps, the economics of "publish first, review later" break down, and AI labs lose a primary channel for placing mediocre or incremental findings into the scientific record.