Source: Quartz
Meta's experimentation with an AI version of Mark Zuckerberg for internal use exposes a real corporate tension: executives want to scale their decision-making and communication without the friction of actual delegation, but an AI simulacrum of leadership creates a liability black hole when things go wrong. The move reflects anxiety about the present, not vision for the future—a shortcut for companies unwilling to build management depth, train middle layers, or distribute real authority. If decisions made by an AI trained on a CEO's patterns cause harm, who bears responsibility, and what does trust in leadership mean when the leader isn't present?