// digital rights

All signals tagged with this topic

Sony argues gamers never own digital games, only license them

Sony's legal defense against California consumer suits hinges on redefining purchase as perpetual licensing—a position that could reshape how the entire industry treats digital ownership if courts accept it. The outcome will determine whether billions in digital game sales are actually sales or rental agreements that publishers can revoke, and whether consumers have any property rights in games they've paid full price to access. At stake is whether the digital games market operates under consumer protection law or corporate service agreements.

Why Flock's Surveillance Model Represents a Dangerous Dead End

Rick Wilson argues that Flock's automated license plate reader network—marketed as crime-fighting infrastructure but operating as mass surveillance—has become indefensible as a business model and civic tool. The company's documented inability to prevent abuses (false arrests, stalking, harassment) while resisting meaningful oversight suggests some technologies cannot be reformed through better policies; they require shutdown. The case challenges the Silicon Valley playbook of "move fast, apologize later" by showing that some infrastructure projects create irreversible social damage before regulation catches up, making preventive opposition more rational than remedial governance.

U.S. Charges Man for Using Duress Password on Encrypted Phone

The government is prosecuting someone for using a built-in security feature—a duress password that wipes a GrapheneOS device—rather than charging them with any underlying crime. By criminalizing the act of triggering the device's self-destruct mechanism, prosecutors are attempting to establish that technical countermeasures to forced data extraction constitute obstruction. If successful, this precedent would effectively criminalize privacy-by-design across all encrypted devices. The case tests whether owning and using privacy technology can itself become illegal in the U.S., with implications far beyond smartphones.

Russians deploy multiple phones and VPNs to dodge tightening internet controls

Russia's escalation of digital restrictions—likely tied to wartime information control—is creating a cat-and-mouse dynamic where ordinary users adopt technical workarounds rather than accept state-mandated constraints. Moscow can legislate blocking but struggles to enforce it at scale, even as the regime invests heavily in blocking infrastructure. Users fragment their behavior across multiple devices and layered circumvention tools, developing technical sophistication as a practical response to control.

News Publishers Deploy Robots.txt to Block Internet Archive

Major news outlets are systematically preventing the Internet Archive's Wayback Machine from preserving their digital journalism, a sharp reversal from the early internet's assumption that published content should be permanently accessible. This reflects publishers' bet that their business model depends on paywalls and ephemeral content rather than archival permanence—effectively privatizing the historical record while relying on public infrastructure (universities, libraries) to fund that choice through licensing fees. The move creates a structural problem: future researchers and fact-checkers lose access to how stories were originally framed, corrected, or disappeared, handing control of media history to individual publishers rather than the public domain.

Colorado's age-gating proposal threatens open-source software model

Colorado's proposed law requiring operating systems to verify and report user ages to apps creates an impossible compliance burden for Linux developers who lack corporate infrastructure for identity verification or data handling—forcing a choice between abandoning the OS or building surveillance systems into free software. This exposes friction between state-level internet regulation designed for centralized platforms (Apple, Google) and the distributed, volunteer-driven open-source ecosystem that underpins critical infrastructure but has no legal department to navigate compliance.