// media criticism

All signals tagged with this topic

Sep 2

LSAT's Monopoly on Law School Access Is Finally Breaking

The LSAT has functioned as an unelected gatekeeper for decades, forcing all aspiring lawyers through a single standardized test that correlates more strongly with test-prep spending than legal aptitude. Law schools are now introducing alternative admissions pathways—GRE acceptance, portfolio-based review—as the test's predictive validity erodes and pressure mounts to diversify a profession that remains overwhelmingly white and wealthy. When a single arbiter controls access to a $200B+ profession, alternatives eventually emerge, usually from the margins first.

theme-culture ai adoption public policy media criticism

Jul 26

Canadian politician reads AI speech, including the prompt

Source: Boing Boing

A New Brunswick legislator delivered remarks that included the raw AI prompt—the instruction text that should have been stripped before delivery—revealing how casually some political actors are adopting generative tools without basic quality control. The incident points to institutional decay: the moment when using AI becomes so routine that traditional safeguards (editing, review, basic competence checks) simply vanish. We're past the "AI is novel" phase and into the phase where it's embedded in mediocre workflows with no gatekeeping.

theme-culture media criticism AI narrative education policy

Jul 7

AI Hype Cycles Obscure Actual Product Maturity

Source: Substack

The piece separates marketing cycles from genuine capability shifts. Confidence theater crowds out harder work: mapping where AI fails, defining legitimate governance, and separating use cases with real ROI from solutions in search of problems.

theme-culture media criticism workplace culture mental health narrative

Jul 6

Why Remote Work Mental Health Claims Don't Hold Up

Source: Michael Easter

The article challenges recent high-profile reporting—notably from the New York Times—that frames remote work as a mental health crisis, arguing the underlying studies are being misinterpreted or lack rigor to support such claims. Corporate real estate interests, office landlords, and return-to-office advocates have used these weak studies to justify mandates that primarily benefit their financial models, not worker wellbeing. The pattern is clear: flawed science becomes policy when it aligns with incumbent power structures' interests.